Missing Las Vegas

Were it not for the ongoing NBA lockout, this blog post would come with a Las Vegas dateline. The thought has no doubt crossed the mind of NBA players, prospects, rookies, executives, and all manner of followers and scribes as we stand in place this first week of July.

“Dude,” (and I’m giving NBA players, prospects, rookies, etc. the voice of  Jeff Spicoli here) ” we should be in Vegas right now.”

For the past six years, NBA Summer League has set up camp at UNLV’s Thomas Mack Center and the adjoining Cox Pavilion, giving NBA big wigs — and the accompanying mob of beat writers — an excuse to set up shop for a working vacation in Sin City.

This year, we’ve all crapped out.

Summer League was the first official casualty of the lockout, scuttled before the lockout even became official. For sportswriters who had come to count on the annual Vegas trip as an easy way to fill both newshole and expense reports, it’s a bummer.

For NBA prospects who might have parlayed a nice run in Vegas into a full-time job, it could be devastating. Just ask Gary Neal, whose five-game run in Las Vegas last season was the final straw in securing him a contract with the Spurs.

“Summer League definitely sealed the deal for me,” Neal told the Express-News back in April, when it became apparent the 2011 version might be in jeopardy. “With no summer league, who knows what would have happened?”

Certainly, the cancellation of  Summer League reduces the chances that the Spurs — or some other team — can ferret out this year’s version of Neal, a diamond-in-the-rough who went on to earn a solid spot in Gregg Popovich’s rotation and first-team All-Rookie honors.

“It’s an opportunity taken away from a guy trying to get into the league,” Neal said in April. “It can close a couple doors for some guys.”

Truth be told, the Spurs weren’t counting on mining another Neal out of the Las Vegas desert. That kind of jackpot doesn’t comes around all that often.

Still, Summer League had become an integral part of the Spurs’ player development program, for rookies and young returning veterans alike. There will be a void this offseason.

“It’s been huge for us, actually,” Popovich said in April, before the event was shuttered. “There have been a large number of people who have started their knowledge of what the NBA is all about in summer league. We really get a good feeling about players there.”

With that in mind, here are some Spurs players for whom the loss of summer league might be particularly harmful:

* Kawhi Leonard and Cory Joseph. Summer League is generally a rookie’s first real exposure to anything approaching an NBA game. The Spurs’ two first-round picks in the June draft won’t have that luxury. They’ll basically have to hit the ground running in training camp.

* James Anderson. In terms of NBA service time, Anderson isn’t a rookie, but might as well be. He missed his first crack at Summer League in 2010 with a strained hamstring, and that absence set him back once the real season began. After appearing in just 26 games as a rookie, Anderson could have used a nice run in Vegas this summer.

* Danny Green and Da’Sean Butler. Green made fans in the front office last season with his willingness to shoot the basketball. He could have used a solid Summer League to bolster those good feelings about him. Butler, meanwhile, is the wildest of wild cards, having not played in an organized game since blowing out his knee in the 2010 Final Four. In short, he’s the kind of guy for whom the Vegas stage was built.

* Gary Neal. On the surface, Neal 2.0 isn’t the type of player normally dispatched to Summer League. As a rookie, he established himself as a rotation staple. He’s not a kid looking for exposure. However, with George Hill now playing for Indiana, the Spurs are in need of someone to eat up minutes behind Tony Parker at point guard. Las Vegas would have been the perfect place for Neal to put his work-in-progress point guard skills into practice.

TP set for his own French cartoon series

It’s been a busy off-season for Tony Parker.

First, there were all those nasty trade rumors. But after getting a chance to get back to France, he’s been participating in some non-playing pursuits.

His recent commercial for Body Axe spray where he plays God in ais getting heavy play back in his home country. (Hat tip Project Spurs.com)

And he’s also announced he will be a part of a new French basketball-themed cartoon called The show follows a group of young basketball players who travel the United States with Parker taking on rival teams.

During his recent trip to France, Parker appeared on French TV show “High 5″ and debuted the first scenes of his show. Here’s a .

I know a little bit about cartoons from my own recent fatherhood with my boy. Parker’s show looks a lot like the “Scooby Doo” shows my son likes with Parker in the starring role and plenty of basketball thrown in for good measure.  

But I especially liked !” After checking the set design and some of his co-stars, French television looks a lot like a Saturday Night Live sketch.

How Scarborough’s NBA’s ‘WAL’ rankings shook out

I’ve gotten a couple of e-mails over the weekend wondering how the Spurs’ “watched/attended/listened” rankings compiled by the Scarborough Sports Marketing Group compared to others across the league. 

These questions were a result of a story in Saturday’s paper where Bill Nielsen, Scarborough’s vice president of sales,  said the Spurs should be in position to endure the lockout better than other NBA franchises because of their traditional strong support.

The good folks at Scarborough were willing to share their most recent “WAL” rankings for the NBA and the other major sports.

It’s a ranking that determines what percentage of fans in a market have either watched a local team on television, attended a game in person or listened to one on radio in the last year.

The ranking provides a pretty accurate glimpse of the NBA’s best and worst American markets. Toronto isn’t included in their compilations.

Here’s a look at the NBA from 1 through 29 for their most recent figures of this season. The number is parenthesis is where the team ranked in Scarborough’s last rankings.

(1) San Antonio Spurs:            61%      (1)

(2) Cleveland Cavaliers:          58%      (2)

(3) Boston Celtics:                     50%      (6)

(4) Utah Jazz:                              47%      (3)

(5) Phoenix Suns:                      45%      (5)

(6) Los Angeles Lakers:           44%      (10)

(7) Oklahoma City Thunder: 44%      (17)

(8) Portland Trail Blazers:     43%      (7)

(9) New Orleans Hornets:      41%      (8)

(10) Denver Nuggets:              40%      (12)

(11) Dallas Mavericks:             39%      (9)

(12) Chicago Bulls:                    39%      (15)

(13) Detroit Pistons:                 38%      (4)

(14) Memphis Grizzlies:          37%      (13)

(15) Miami Heat:                        37%      (18)

(16) Houston Rockets:             37%      (11)

(17) Orlando Magic:                  33%      (14)

(18) Milwaukee Bucks:              33%      (19)

(19) Indiana Pacers:                  30%      (16)

(20) Sacramento Kings:           28%      (20)

(21) Atlanta Hawks:                    24%      (24)

(22) Charlotte Bobcats:             24%      (23)

(23) Philadelphia 76ers:           23%      (22)

(24) Golden State Warriors:     20%      (26)

(25) New York Knicks:               18%      (27)

(26) Washington Wizards:        18%      (25)

(27) Minnesota T’wolves:         16%      (21)

(28) Los Angeles Clippers:        12%      (28)

(29) New Jersey Nets:                 11%      (29)

These numbers indicate a couple of different findings. It can be argued that the markets at the top of the list have been the league’s best over the years. I’m also intrigued with the way that Oklahoma City’s market is getting excited about the Thunder for obvious reasons.

And as teams take these numbers to potential advertisers, even the larger markets at the bottom of the list like New York, New Jersey and the Los Angeles Clippers all have markets of millions of potential customers.

Here’s a listing of the best and worst teams in Scarborough’s most recent rankings for Major League Baseball.

The best:

(1) St. Louis Cardinals:       73%      (2)

(2) Cincinnati Reds:            70%      (7)

(3) Minnesota Twins:         70%      (3)

(4) Boston Red Sox:            69%      (1)

(5) Philadelphia Phillies:   69%      (4)

 And the worst:

(25) New York Mets:             36%      (26)

(26) Los Angeles Dodgers:  34%      (25)

(27) Washington Nationals: 33%      (28)

(28) Los Angeles Angels:      29%      (27)

(29) Oakland Athletics:         28%      (29)

 And here are Scarborough’s most recent WAL rankings for National Football League franchises.

The best:

(1) New Orleans Saints:      87%      (2)

(2) Green Bay Packers:       84%      (1)

(3) Pittsburgh Steelers:      82%      (3)

(4) Indianapolis Colts:        75%      (4)

(5) Minnesota Vikings:       73%      (5)

And the worst:

(28) Miami Dolphins:           43%      (28)

(29) San Francisco 49ers:  42%      (29)

(30) New York Giants:         40%      (30)

(31) New York Jets:              37%      (31)

(32) Oakland Raiders:          28%      (32)

These ratings show