McDyess: No regrets about time with Spurs

By Mike Monroe
mikemonroe@express-news.net

Sitting at his locker an hour before what became the final game of his 16-year NBA career, Spurs power forward Antonio McDyess winced.

He was trying to maneuver his back into a position that eased the twinge he still felt on the left side of his neck and down his left shoulder and arm — the result of a Game 3 injury that had left his arm totally numb.

Seeing his quest for comfort, a teammate asked the team’s oldest player how he felt.

“Not great,” McDyess replied.

Later, Grizzlies star Zach Randolph would lay an elbow to McDyess’ head and make things even worse, and force him to the bench to receive attention from the team’s medical staff.

As he stashed the last items from the locker in a travel bag, McDyess reflected on his two seasons in San Antonio, adamant he had made up his mind to retire and without regret for having chosen the Spurs over other teams that vied for his services in the summer of 2009.

“This was not at all how I wanted it to end, but signing here was one of the best things I did in my career,” he said. “I wouldn’t trade these two years for the world, one of the greatest times of my whole career. I just wish we would have gone farther.”

Spurs coach Gregg Popovich is going to miss McDyess, as a player and person, but will respect his decision.

“We’re not going to fight him,” Popovich said. “If he does retire, as much as a player, we would miss him more as a person. He’s one of the finest human beings I’ve ever been associated with. He commands huge, huge buckets of respect from his teammates, just from the way he conducts himself. He’s just a wonderful man. So if he does retire, we’ll really miss him in that leadership role.”

The highlight of McDyess’ final season in silver and black was a buzzer-beating tip-in that gave the Spurs an 89-88 victory over the Lakers at the Staples Center on Feb. 3.

His final basket as a Spur, a perfect 20-foot jumper from the top of the key, gave his team its only lead of the second half of Friday’s elimination game in Memphis.

“This was one of the most enjoyable seasons I’ve ever had but disappointing we couldn’t go farther than the first round,” McDyess said.

When the Spurs were blown out in Game 4 at Memphis, he called out his teammates for being timid, including himself.

“I think that first game at home kind of set the tone for the whole series,” he said. “We weren’t aggressive, and the Grizzlies were ready to play us, and we should have taken that to heart when they said they wanted to play us. They came out exactly like a team that wanted to play us, and we were just taking their punches and weren’t coming back at them.”

INCREDIBLE, SHRINKING R.J.: After making 44 percent of his 3-point shots and averaging 11.0 points per game, starting small forward Richard Jefferson was benched for the entire second half of Friday’s Game 6 — scoreless for the second time in the series.

After making 5 of 9 3-pointers in Games 1 and 2, Jefferson made only one of his next eight. He averaged just 6.5 points in the series and by its end was strictly a spectator. He played only 10 minutes and 13 seconds of Game 6 — all in the first half.

Only seven times in his 10 seasons had Jefferson failed to score, and two of those came in the series against the Grizzlies.

Sobering SI story predicting gloom for Spurs after Memphis series loss

The Spurs’ loss against Memphis  got the full analysis as the major topic in Chris Mannix’s “Inside the NBA” column in this week’s Sports Illustrated.

Mannix was in Memphis for Game 6 of the series with the Grizzlies and paints a gloomy picture for the Spurs’ future.

“They are the model franchise, owners of four championships in the last 13 seasons and the highest winning percentage in pro sports since 1997 (69.9 percent). But as the Spurs walked off the FedExForum floor in Memphis last Friday after a 99-91 Game 6 loss, they faced, for the first time in a long time, uncertainty. The Grizzlies exposed several weaknesses in San Antonio’s roster, flaws that are not easily fixed.”

Mannix describes the struggling play the Spurs received inside against Memphis’ strong interior tandem of Marc Gasol and Zach Randolph in the series. And he also highlights Richard Jefferson’s baffling playoff slump, where he scored 10 points in 106 minutes in the final four games of the series.

“You hate to say it,” an unnamed Western Conference scout tells Mannix, “but it looks like it’s time to rebuild.”

Gregg Popovich was adamant after the series ended that he’s not yet ready to do that. And after winning a Western Division-best 61 games this season it’s probably understandable he believes his team can contend again with its current roster.

But Mannix isn’t necessarily buying that.

“The core of the team — (Tim) Duncan, Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker — is  good enough to stay in the playoffs, but without frontcourt help, San Antonio’s days as a contender are over,” Mannix wrote.

It will make for an interesting off-season for the Spurs as they wrestle with trying to solve those problems.  

I’m curious. Does Spurs Nation believe the rest of the country has been too quick in writing the obituary for the Spurs’ dynasty?

Buck Harvey: Blank no more: Memphis’ rise, luck

Chris Wallace stayed behind in Memphis for Game 1. The general manager of the Grizzlies had a few things to do, such as work on a new contract for Zach Randolph.

So he’s watching the game Sunday afternoon, living and dying with every possession — when his satellite transmission goes out with about a minute left.

Wallace is searching for another broadcast, frantic with every passing second, until the game returns with 10 seconds left. Given what happened in that time, maybe nothing better describes the current status of Wallace and his franchise.

From a blank screen to the startling news.

You mean everything worked out?

Wallace laughed while telling the story Monday. Few GMs are as accessible and as affable.

Now he has reason to share even more, because February of 2008 seems so long ago. That’s when Wallace traded Pau Gasol to the Lakers, and criticism flowed toward Memphis as relentlessly as the Mississippi.

“What they did,” Gregg Popovich notably said then, “is beyond comprehension.”

NBA execs rarely critique each other this way. After all, if Wallace wanted, he could evaluate the Spurs.

Such as: Isn’t it beyond comprehension they discarded Luis Scola for money?

But Wallace didn’t fire back. “I said at the time, the Lakers got their benefit from the first day Pau suited up,” he said. “Ours was delayed gratification.”

There would be delays, all right, and Wallace didn’t control all of it. He’s not unlike Bob Bass, the former Spurs general manager, who served under hyperactive owners. Wallace is sometimes a GM, but he’s sometimes a powerless observer, too.

This goes back a few years. When he worked in Boston, he wanted to draft an unknown from France named Tony Parker. Red Auerbach, fading but still with the influence of a legend, wanted an American kid who eventually flopped.

The Grizzlies owner, Michael Heisley, has been more involved than Auerbach. Heisley gets the blame for drafting Hasheem Thabeet, as well as thinking Allen Iverson would be a swell fit.

Heisley is a self-made millionaire with self-made wounds. But it was Wallace who put together the Pau deal, and that was the move that came to define a confused franchise.

Popovich wasn’t the only one who rolled his eyes. Lionel Hollins, for example, wasn’t employed by the Grizzlies then. Asked how he saw the deal at the time, he was candid Monday.

“They probably could have gotten more,” Hollins said.

But everything worked out, right?

“Sometimes the worst thing can become the best,” Hollins said. “This league is all about luck.”

Hollins said people apply the word “genius” to those who make the right guess. Others would have taken Thabeet, he said, and some teams passed on Michael Jordan.

The Spurs have often admitted as much. They’ve been held up as innovators and professionals, and the Spurs Way has produced championships. But they had luck, too; if they knew Manu Ginobili would be this good, they wouldn’t have waited until the bottom of the second round to take him.

Wallace argues there was more than luck. Memphis had a plan, and it was a valid one. “Pau’s been like an NBA version of an organ donor,” he said, “with how he’s provided life to this current team.”

It requires a spreadsheet to keep up with all of the transactions that came from the Pau trade, but this much is certain: The Grizzlies have the core of their team, Marc Gasol and Randolph, because of the Pau trade.

Did they know Marc would someday have a better playoff afternoon than his brother? Did they foresee Randolph not only becoming available, but also being a perfect fit?

No and no. But both are Grizzlies because Pau is not, and Popovich has another reason not to like the 2008 trade.

About a year ago, when it was clear the Grizzlies were on to something, Popovich softened his stance. “I was just trying to be a wise-ass,” he said of his previous comments.

But Wallace never heard from Popovich personally, and he’s okay with that.

“I never took any offense,” he said. “I have so much respect for him and R.C. (Buford). There’s no question they have created the finest organization in the league.”

It’s easier to be forgiving now. With a 1-0 series lead on the finest organization in the league.

bharvey@express-news.net