Manu Ginobili at 35

One of the central tenets of Buddhism is impermanence, the notion that nothing – not personality traits, not physical conditions, not material items, nothing – can resist the inexorable force of change.

Tony Parker is obviously not an adherent of this concept.

“Still the same,” is how Parker describes long-time backcourt partner at 35, on the verge of his 11th season.

This, of course, is impossible. But while Ginobili’s athleticism and hairline aren’t what they used to be, just about everything else has aged nicely.

Indeed, from the standpoint of pure skill, Ginobili has never been better. It’s just a matter of whether his body, at an age where many of his historic peers had already called it quits, will cooperate.

Before we fiddle around with those details, it’s worthwhile examining just how much Ginobili has already changed over the years, most of which has been for the good.

While not quite in the same class as Vince Carter or Kobe Bryant as an athlete, Ginobili wasn’t far behind when he entered the NBA in 2002. But even then, when he could regularly dunk like , what stood out most were his instincts and basketball IQ, qualities that have only improved with experience.

An average shooter as a rookie in 2002-03, Ginobili shot a career-best 41.3 percent from 3-point range last season while finishing third in the league in true shooting percentage at 66.8. (To put the latter figure into perspective, it would have been the third-best TS% for a guard in NBA history if he’d played enough games.)

Perhaps more impressive is his development as a ball-handler and playmaker.

Ginobili registered a minus 5.59 pure point rating in his second-to-last season with Virtus Bologna, which basically means he was a turnover waiting to happen. Ten years later he finished at 4.50, placing him first among NBA shooting guards and second among all non-point guards in 2011-12.

That brings us to today, where the Spurs will be keeping their fingers crossed that Ginobili can bring all those skills to bear following a season in which he missed 32 games and under performed in the postseason.

ESPN’s John Hollinger projects another quality campaign (21.8 PER, with 21 points, 5.8 assists and 7.0 rebounds per 40 minutes).

Although no clear trend is discernable, it’s also interesting to look at how other elite shooting guards fared at 35:

George Gervin, Allen Iverson, Paul Westphal, Sidney Moncrief, Bill Sharman and Dave Bing were all retired, while Michael Redd is on the verge.

Vince Carter (10.1 ppg, 51.9 TS%, 13.6 PER) had the worst season of his career. Mitch Richmond had the second-worst (16.2 ppg, 52.1 TS%, 14.9 PER).

Jerry West produced at an All-Star level (20.3 ppg, 22.4 PER) but appeared in just 31 games.

Ray Allen did make the All-Star team, averaging 16.5 points with a total shooting percentage of 61.5.

Reggie Miller, Jeff Hornacek, Fred Brown and Sam Jones had quality campaigns, recording PERs between 17.1 and 17.8 while playing varying roles. Miller was particularly good, averaging 18.9 points on 57.4 TS% while playing more than 39 minutes per game.

Then there was Clyde Drexler, who performed almost identically at 35 (18.7 ppg, 53.1 TS%, 19.8 PER) as he did at 23 (19.4 ppg, 53.0 TS%, 19.4 PER).

(Michael Jordan likely would have been an MVP candidate at 35 – he won the award at 34 in his final season with the Bulls – but retired before returning for those two Twilight Zone seasons with the Washington Wizards.)

Where Ginobili will fall on that continuum is impossible to tell at this point, especially given a history of injuries that has forced him to miss roughly one out of every five games in the NBA.

He’s at least been handled delicately, never averaging more than 32.3 minutes during that span and another two seasons in Italy. As a result he’s played considerably fewer minutes than many of the aforementioned players at similar stages in their career, including roughly 17,000 less than Jordan.

That extra time on the bench could be a blessing in disguise now that Ginobili is in the twilight of his career, trying to squeeze out a few more seasons in which to utilize the skill set he’s polished to such a fine sheen.

Spurs remain No. 1 in four national power rankings

John Schuhmann,

Ranking: Third

Teams ahead: Chicago, Oklahoma City

Last week: First

What he said: “Did the Spurs punt away the No. 1 seed in the West by leaving their big three at home on Monday, or by getting crushed on the glass by Andrew Bynum and the Kobe-less Lakers two nights later? They have a road back-to-back-to-back this week, so expect more rest for their stars as they settle into the No. 2 spot.”

Sam Amico,

Ranking: First

Teams ahead: None

Last week: Second

What he said: “Good news: Suddenly look like most cohesive team in league again. Bad: Entered last season’s playoffs looking same.”

Tom Ziller,

Ranking: First

Teams ahead: None

Last week: First

What he said: “The Spurs have a revenge match against the Lakers on Tuesday, but it still doesn’t matter. Nothing matters for the Spurs until April 28 or 29, when their playoff quest for one more ring with Tim Duncan begins. So long as the team enters healthy and with a modicum of freshness, they will be a daunting task for any and all West contenders. That’s all that matters.”

Marc Stein,

Ranking: Third

Teams ahead: Chicago, Oklahoma City

Last week: First

What he said: “Pop holds a narrow lead over Thibodeau and Doc Rivers in another ridiculous COY race with what might be his best-ever coaching job. Even if the Spurs don’t snag the West’s No. 1 seed — and even after the Kobe-less Lakers humbled them at home — he still has ‘em at a level no one envisioned. No one.”

John Hollinger,

Ranking: First

Teams ahead: None

Last week: Second

Chances of winning: Hollinger estimates the Spurs have a 76.2 percent chance of winning the No. 1 seed in the Western Conference, a 37 percent chance of making the NBA Finals and a .

Britt Robson,

Ranking: First

Teams ahead: None

Last week: First

What he said: “During this intense, condensed regular-season schedule, there seems to have been more commentary about Tim Duncan resting than about the way he has played. That’s probably because there has been very little decline during his 15th season. His shooting percentage is down slightly but his scoring average is up, as he has taken a few more mid-range jumpers than in previous years. Defensively, the Big Fundamental continues to set the standard for San Antonio, which allows its fewest points per possession when he is on the court. Despite all the chatter, he has missed only five of 60 games — though he is likely to sit out either Tuesday or Wednesday, as San Antonio completes a stretch of three games in three nights — and is logging the same 28 minutes per game he put in last season. Perhaps the biggest difference from a year ago has been the emergence of Tiago Splitter, who gives the Spurs another tall and capable rim protector aside from Duncan.” 

Kurt Helin,

Spurs soaring in weekly rankings check

It’s funny how much national attention an eight-game winning streak can provide.

We’re seeing that in the comments about the Spurs in our weekly survey of the pundits who rank the NBA teams each week.

Here are their rankings about the surging Spurs this week. 

John Schuhmann,

Ranking: Fifth

Last week: Seventh

Teams ahead: Miami, Chicago,  Oklahoma City, L.A. Clippers.

What he said: San Antonio has won (eight) straight, the rodeo trip is off to a great start (including wins in Memphis and Philly) and Manu Ginobili is back. It may be time to include the Spurs among the Western Conference contenders again, especially considering their defense has been much improved during the streak.”

Marc Stein,

Ranking: Second

Last week: Fifth

Teams ahead: Miami.

What he said: “The annual Rodeo Road Trip is generally good to the Spurs, but this one looks like it’ll go down as an all-timer. The Spurs figure to be 5-0 before their next tough test Feb. 18 in Clipperland, Duncan has five straight double-doubles after just five in his first 23 games … and Manu just came back!”

John Hollinger,

Ranking: Fifth

Last week: Fifth.

Teams ahead: Chicago, Miami, Oklahoma City, Philadelphia.

Current seed: Second in Western Conference.

Chances of winning: Hollinger estimates the Spurs have a , a 79.2 percent chance of winning the Southwest Division, a 26.6 percent chance of earning the No. 1 seed in the West before the playoffs, a 25 percent chance of making the NBA Finals and a 9.5 percent chance of winning the NBA title.

Britt Robson,

Ranking: Fourth

Last week: Seventh

Teams in front: Miami, Chicago, Oklahoma City.

What he said: “There seems to be nothing but good news for the surging Spurs. They started (4-0) on their nine-game road trip, saw Tony Parker selected to the All-Star team and welcomed back Manu Ginobili for limited action on Saturday after he’d missed 22 games with a broken hand. Perhaps best of all, they have firmed up their defense, allowing less than the league-average field-goal percentage to seven of their last 10 opponents since New Orleans burned them for plus-50 percent shooting in all four quarters on Jan. 23. San Antonio is now a respectable 14th in defensive efficiency, after an opening month when it allowed more than 100 points eight times. By contrast, the only triple-digit point total against the Spurs in the last 10 games was the 101-100 loss to Dallas when Gregg Popovich played his bench the entire fourth quarter and overtime. Nine players averaged at least 20 minutes during that span — and now Ginobili’s back.

Kurt Helin,

Ranking: Fifth

Last week: Seventh

Teams ahead: Miami, Miami, Chicago, L.A. Clippers, Oklahoma City.

What he said: “Winners of eight in a row (including in Philly) and they get Manu Ginobili back on their Rodeo Road Trip. They are looking like a team that can make a run in the playoffs, but they looked like that last year so we’re hesitant.”