Spurs have best NBA Finals win-loss record of any team

San Antonio has won four titles in the Gregg Popovich/Tim Duncan era after failing to advance deeper than the conference finals in the team’s previous history.

Those championships rank the team fourth, trailing only the Boston Celtics (17), Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers (16) and Chicago Bulls (six) among all NBA franchises.

But the Spurs do hold one NBA record as the franchise’s 16-6 record in NBA Finals games is the highest winning percentage in the league’s history.

Here’s a look at how the franchise rank in terms of winning percentage. The number inside parenthesis indicates the number of NBA titles a franchise has won.

San Antonio Spurs (4)                                                                                16-6    .727

Chicago Bulls (6)                                                                                         24-11   .686

Baltimore Bullets (1)                                                                                    4-2      .667   X                  

Milwaukee Bucks (1)                                                                                     7-4     .636

Boston Celtics (17)                                                                                     74-48   .607

Rochester/Kansas City/Sacramento Kings  (1)                                  4-3     .571 

Fort Wayne/Detroit Pistons (3)                                                             22-18   .550

Philadelphia/San Francisco/Golden State Warriors (3)              17-14   .548

Houston Rockets (2)                                                                                    12-11   .522

Minneapolis/Los Angeles Lakers  (16)                                                85-83   .503

Seattle/Oklahoma City Thunder (1)                                                        9-9      .500

Dallas Mavericks (1)                                                                                       6-6      .500

Miami Heat (1)                                                                                                  6-6      .500    

Syracuse/Philadelphia 76ers (3)                                                            24-29  .453

St. Louis/Atlanta Hawks (1)                                                                       11-14    .440

New York Knicks (2)                                                                                     20-28   .417

Portland Trail Blazers (1)                                                                              7-10    .412

Phoenix Suns                                                                                                      4-8       .333

Utah Jazz                                                                                                              4-8       .333

Indiana Pacers                                                                                                   2-4        .333

Washington Capitals                                                                                       2-4         .333

Washington Wizards  (1)                                                                               5-15       .250            

New Jersey Nets                                                                                               2-8          .200

Chicago Stags                                                                                                     1-4          .200 X

Orlando Magic                                                                                                   1-8          .111

Cleveland Cavaliers                                                                                        0-4          .000

Note – Buffalo/San Diego/Los Angeles Clippers, Denver Nuggets, Charlotte/New Orleans Hornets, Minnesota Timberwolves, Vancouver/Memphis Grizzlies, Toronto Raptors and Charlotte Bobcats have never appeared in an NBA Finals.

X – indicates defunct franchise.

Source: Express-News research  

Note – X indicates defunct franchises

NFL, NBA labor disputes tale of two lockouts

forward was watching back in March, when pro football players such as and announced they were disbanding their union and suing the NFL under antitrust law.

“We’ll see how the next steps go,” Tolliver said at the time. “Hopefully, we’ll learn from them.”

Well, now it’s time to find out what Tolliver and his peers picked up. He’s one of a handful of basketball players, including All-Stars Carmelo Anthony and , who filed class-action antitrust complaints against the in federal court during the past week.

That could lead to a dragged-out legal process or — as happened with the NFL’s labor dispute — wind up bringing the sides back to the negotiating table.

“We’ve seen every twist and turn, and I imagine we’ll see many more. Hopefully a settlement can be reached, relatively quickly, and the (NBA) season can be saved,” said , outside counsel for both the NFL and NBA players’ associations. “That would be the best result for everyone, to have a litigation settlement now.”

The NBA’s lockout came swiftly on the heels of the NFL’s, already has lasted longer, and there’s one significant difference: Football’s labor dispute resulted in the loss of only a single exhibition game, while the NBA is on its way down the path toward a shortened regular season — if one is played at all.

NFL commissioner spoke repeatedly about getting a deal done and keeping the season intact. When the most recent round of NBA talks broke off Monday, commissioner spoke about a “nuclear winter” and said it appeared “the 2011-12 season is really in jeopardy.” Tuesday was the first time players missed out on a twice-a-month paycheck because of the lockout; people who work at an NBA arena or a nearby bar or restaurant already began feeling lighter in their pockets last month, when preseason games began getting wiped out.

“This lockout doesn’t just hurt players. It hurts workers. It hurts cities. It hurts people who really need the income provided by the NBA,” Kessler said. “But what people have to keep in mind is that the players don’t want this lockout.”

For the time being, the only chance to see All-Stars such as or in action is to catch one of the player-organized games for charity. Unless, that is, some of them follow through on opportunities to play overseas: was in contact with a team in Italy; authorized his agent to listen to viable offers.

NFL players didn’t have that international option, of course.

Both leagues’ labor problems began, at their heart, as arguments over how to divide billions of dollars in revenues — about $9 billion for the NFL, $4 billion for the NBA — but also over how to change the rules governing player contracts and free agency. Both featured acrimonious dialogue in public.

Both bothered fans who couldn’t understand why it was so hard to find common ground.

“The NFL owners and players had time to let the legal battle play out,” said , director of the Sports Law program at Tulane. “The NBA owners and players don’t. This has to be a quick legal strike and, unfortunately in our litigation system, there aren’t many opportunities to get a quick legal strike.”

The two disputes’ timelines:

After 16 days of negotiations overseen by federal mediator , the announced it was dissolving on March 11, hours before the old collective bargaining agreement expired as a result of the owners having opted out of the deal. That day, Brady and others sued. As the calendar changed to March 12, the owners imposed the lockout, creating that league’s first work stoppage since 1987. There were nearly five months to go until the first preseason game on Aug. 7 (the only one that eventually was wiped out) and nearly six months until the start of the regular season on Sept. 8. After legal proceedings began, with some wins and losses for both sides, discussions with a different mediator led to progress and, eventually, the NFL’s new, 10-year CBA was signed Aug. 5.

The NBA owners had an option to extend their CBA for one year but allowed it to expire on June 30 and imposed a lockout as the calendar turned to July 1, saying they lost of hundreds of millions of dollars in each season of the old deal and needed to fix things. The league and union accused each other of bargaining in bad faith. They said they were far apart philosophically and financially and didn’t meet again until Aug. 1. With not enough progress made, the league began postponing the Oct. 9 start of the preseason on Sept. 23; by Oct. 11, the Nov. 1 start of the regular season was being pushed back. Here we are, more than two weeks past that date, and there’s no indication when the sides might be back in a room together.

NBA players announced Monday they were rejecting the league’s latest offer and disclaiming interest in their union — and, no longer governed by labor law, would sue under antitrust law, something they did Tuesday in California and Minnesota.

But it was the NBA that first went to federal court, filing a complaint Aug. 2 in New York, saying the players were threatening to dissolve their union. At the time, Stern told that players were “preparing to use the same strategy that the NFL — who uses the same lawyer — used.”

That would be Kessler, the top negotiator for both sports’ players, and he’s hardly the only familiar face. Cohen, for example, tried mediating between the NBA and basketball players, too, but couldn’t help them get a deal done, either.

Kessler recently was joined on the NBA players’ legal team by , who gained fame representing during the recount fight in the disputed 2000 presidential election — and, it so happens, was one of the lawyers who opposed Kessler only months ago while working for the NFL.

Bonner: NBPA executive committee conference call tomorrow will consider next move

Spurs forward Matt Bonner, a member of the National Basketball Players Association’s executive committee, said Sunday the union’s leadership has scheduled a conference call for Monday to discuss its next move.

The NBA late Saturday night gave the union  a formal proposal for a new collective bargaining agreement that Bonner said called for “basically another 50-50 split” of basketball related income, along with some changes in the luxury tax system he said represented little change from the owners’ prior positions.

The union rejected the offer on the spot, whereupon Commissioner David Stern said it would remain only through the end of business on Wednesday.

If not accepted by the close of business Wednesday, Stern said the offer would be withdrawn and replaced by a much worse deal, with a revenue split giving the players only 47 percnet  of BRI and a “flex” salary cap the players already have characterized as an unacceptable hard cap.

Lakers guard Derek Fisher, the union’s president, said the NBA deal was not one the executive committee could take to its players for a vote and Bonner said every member of the executive committee is behind the decision to reject it.

“We’re all on the same page,” he said.

Bonner described the frustration of Saturday’s session, which was conducted under the guidance of George Cohen, head of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.

“Saturday sucked,” he said. “The way we saw of saving the season and getting a deal was by saying the system was more important to us, BRI more important to them; we can compromise on BRI if they can come more to us on the remaining system issues.

“That’s what we were hoping would get a deal and we really thought the approach we took was going to get it done. But when George came back after taking our offer to the owners, what he came back with was five or six changes in system things, and all but one were what  the owners wanted. It was basically their deal.”

Bonner said the executive would discuss all aspects of the impasse in its Monday conference call, including a move by some agents to collect enough player names on petitions to call for a vote that could decertify the union.

Decertification would allow players  to file an anti-trust lawsuit against the league, but the more important immediate result would be some leverage for the union during roughly 45 days it would take for the National Labor Relations Board to arrange a vote of all 450 members of the union.

The threat of decertification and the uncertainty that comes with it could give the union the leverage it needs to coax a better offer from the league than the deal it rejected Saturday.

“I’m sure we’ll talk about everything on the call,” Bonner said.